Tag Archive for: Canada

Challenging Oppressive Maternity Healthcare in Canada

Authors: Stephanie Ragganandan Hon. BSc, York University & Dr. Karen Lawford midwife and PhD, Queen’s University | Editors: Alex Lukey and Arrthy Thayaparan (Blog Coordinators) 

Published: August 9th, 2021

At no time in the present era have healthcare systems been subject to the same extent of research, analysis, critique, and challenge as they have been during the global COVID-19 pandemic. There is a temptation to view any failings in these systems as a matter of contemporary shortcomings. While the health outcomes facing marginalized populations are certainly exacerbated by 21st century technological, economic, and social disparities, in addition to being disproportionately impacted by COVID-19, it is crucial we remember the root cause of these disparities. It is only by understanding the past that we can make sense of the present and imagine a future that liberates us all from oppressive, ineffective, and unsustainable healthcare services.

Canada, like many other countries across the world, was founded on colonialism. Colonialism is often framed as something from the past and as having no association with current times, but this is not the truth. We are living in an ongoing colonial project that is geo-politically known as Canada.

What is colonialism? It is the process by which one group takes control of another group’s lands, resources, and governance authorities and maintains that group in a state of subordination based on the beliefs of racial and cultural inferiority of the subordinated group. In Canada, the legal, education, and healthcare systems—for example—are deeply rooted in Eurocentric, Christian ideologies and practices that purposefully oppress Indigenous Peoples’ philosophies, values, ways of making knowledge, and kinship relationships.

As healthcare researchers, we strongly assert it is vital to acknowledge and recognize the existence, maintenance, and practice of the ongoing colonization project in Canada via Euro-Canadian healthcare services, programming, and education, and within medicine itself, because Indigenous Peoples’ knowledge systems are currently marginalized, made irrelevant, and tokenized. The invisibility of these areas of colonization is ethically unsound, immoral, and does not contribute to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada’s Calls to Action, specifically Calls 18-24.

We are especially committed to drawing attention to the implications of colonization on the sexual and reproductive health of Indigenous Peoples. Since contact with white Christian colonizers, Indigenous Peoples have fought to protect their customary practices, languages, and ways of health and wellness. Yet, nationally coordinated and funded assimilation efforts via various genocidal mechanisms, such as the Indian Residential School system, have resulted in the degradation and criminalization of Indigenous Peoples including their customary healing practices and practitioners.

We strongly assert that the process of improving current systems-wide healthcare must begin by recognizing the interconnected webs of colonization that are woven into all colonial healthcare systems in Canada.

Comprehensive Gender-Inclusive Sexual and Reproductive Health Care

Indigenous customary practices and practitioners that support and manage pregnancy, labour, birth, and postpartum periods have sustained Indigenous Peoples on these lands since time immemorial. In fact, their technologies, skills, and medicines were used by white Christian settlers when they first invaded these lands to ensure their own pregnancies were conducted in a safe manner. Over time, the Euro-Canadian biomedical model and its practitioners purposefully marginalized and criminalized Indigenous knowledge and practices. The ability of Indigenous Peoples to determine how to achieve their own health and wellness eventually became—and continues to be—oppressed. Consequently, the health of Indigenous Peoples from a Euro-Canadian lens shows that Indigenous people are less healthy than non-Indigenous people. But, healthcare systems in Canada continue to refuse to see, let alone acknowledge, the harm they have caused to Indigenous Peoples via neglect, refusal of care, and structurally ingrained colonial oppressions.

While the term decolonization has become a buzzword, especially following the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada reports, we advocate for the recognition of colonization in health, which includes education, training, programming, funding, and practice. High-quality, comprehensive gender-inclusive sexual and reproductive health care for Indigenous Peoples can be achieved, but we must first come to terms with the extent to which colonization has purposefully obstructed the health and wellness of Indigenous Peoples.

Canada’s Evacuation Policy for Indigenous Peoples

Beginning in the late 1800s, the Government of Canada decided to introduce European-trained obstetricians to those who live on reserve. Alongside the medicalization of childbirth, the criminalization of Indigenous healthcare practices and practitioners, the immigration of British trained nurse-midwives, and the establishment of Indian hospitals, birthing for Indigenous Peoples shifted from home and community to nursing stations, then Indian hospitals, and now urban hospitals. The federal policy driving this relocation of birth is underpinned by the Government of Canada’s evacuation policy, which requires that pregnant people between 36- and 38-weeks of gestation are relocated to urban settings to await labour and birth. In addition to physically removing pregnant people from their families, communities and pregnancy customs and practices, the evacuation policy results in increased experiences of racism as well as feelings of isolation, fear, distress, sadness, and loneliness, which can lead to post-partum depression.

Canada’s evacuation policy supported “…colonial goals to civilize and assimilate [Indigenous Peoples] into a generic Canadian body.” So, colonial maternity care practices established during a time of aggressive assimilation and civilization tactics, which were implemented and funded by the Government of Canada, have resulted in the current, disjointed approach to maternity care practices for Indigenous Peoples. In fact, evacuation for birth has not resulted in comparable outcomes: the infant mortality rate for Indigenous Peoples in Canada ranges from two to four times that of non-Indigenous people. Clearly, the justification that the evacuation policy improves the maternal and infant outcomes is unfounded. It is thus clear that the Euro-Canadian biomedical model of maternity care must change so that Indigenous Peoples can realize the health and wellness they so deserve.

What’s Next?

Indigenous Peoples’ customary practices and practitioners must be reframed as necessary components of healthcare systems across Canada and globally. The exclusion and even criminalization of Indigenous People who are healthcare providers—like Indigenous Midwives—deliberately creates oppressive barriers to health and wellness for Indigenous Peoples.

It is extremely important to understand colonialism within the historical and contemporary contexts because it globally impacts Indigenous Peoples byways of land destruction, separation from family through colonial training programs (e.g. the Indian Residential School System), and the oppression of Indigenous customary philosophies, values, ways of making knowledge, and kinship relationships.

For those of us with influence in Euro-Canadian healthcare systems, we must work towards the creation of inclusive healthcare that promotes a plurality of knowledge systems, and put these systems and practitioners who provide care for Indigenous Peoples at the forefront of our agendas. We must also contemplate the nature and extent of repairs that are required to bring justice to those who have suffered at the hands of colonial systems.

It is time to acknowledge the ongoing colonial violence in healthcare and dismantle the oppressive cultures that constitute Canadian healthcare systems.

 

**If this is an issue you are passionate about, consider becoming a supportive member of the National Aboriginal Council of Midwives (NACM) here.**

Here is a list of benefits of a supportive membership from the NACM

  • Act of reconciliation and allyship
  • Promote the growth of Indigenous midwifery
  • Contribute to the improvement of reproductive and child health in Indigenous communities
  • Receive NACM newsletter

 

Osteoporosis in Canadian Women: Building Strong Bones for a Healthy Life

Author: Shali Tayebi, MSc Global Health, University of Copenhagen | Editors: Alex Lukey and Arrthy Thayaparan (Blog Coordinators) 

Published: February 12th, 2021

Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease that is a major public health issue. It also places a tremendous physical, emotional and mental burden on those who it afflicts. Over 200 million people worldwide are affected by osteoporosis. There are 2.2 million people with osteoporosis in Canada; a country with a growing and ageing population [3,7]. 

The disease is characterized by weakening bones, which increases the risk of fractures. Most often, people live with bone loss for many years without knowledge of their condition until their first fracture — most commonly in their hip, wrist, or spine. Physical consequences can include reduced mobility, disability, chronic pain, loss of height, and premature death [7]. 

Subsequent psychological effects can follow. This includes depression in reaction to living with a chronic condition and anxiety stemming from a fear of future injuries and falling. People may experience a social decline through the loss of social duties and social isolation [7]. 

Causes

The causes of osteoporosis are grouped into primary and secondary classifications. The primary group mainly consists of older individuals experiencing changes in hormone levels after reaching menopause and from chronic low dietary calcium. In the secondary group, low bone mass is a side effect of other health conditions [3]. 

Risk Factors

More than 80% of cases in Canada are women. This increased risk is due to several factors. First, women tend to have thinner, smaller, and less dense bones than men. Women often also have longer life spans than men and are more likely to make up a bigger portion of those with osteoporosis in older demographics. Lastly, a bone mass loss can be attributed to the sex-exclusive biological event of reaching menopause due to dramatic hormonal changes.

Other notable co-risk factors include small body size (weighing less than 127 pounds), eating disorders, missing menstruation for at least three consecutive months (amenorrhea), and genetics. Ethnicity affects the prevalence of osteoporosis through the correlation of bone mineral density (BMD) [3]. In one study conducted by Keen and Reddivari (2020) in the United States, the highest prevalence rates were noted in Indigenous Americans with 11.9%, Asians 10%, Hispanics 9.8%, Caucasians 7.2%, and Black Americans 4% [3].

Prevention

Building strong bones and using preventative strategies is essential in maintaining good health later in life. New bone generation slows down with age compared to bone loss, so early prevention is critical. By 18 years of age, women have already developed 90% of their bone mass. Thus, it is crucial to minimize health problems that impede building bone mass early in life, such as eating disorders, poor diets, and lack of physical activity. Once reaching adulthood, it is important to adopt healthy habits and activities so that the natural degradation of the bones is reduced. Exercise, especially weight-bearing activities that work the body against gravity, such as dancing, tai chi, yoga, running, and walking, help build strong bones and prevent bone loss.

Mitigation strategies include lifestyle changes, such as cessation of smoking, reducing alcohol consumption, and adequate calcium and vitamin D intake. The amount of calcium one needs depends on the person’s age. Since the body does not produce calcium, it needs to be consumed through foods such as milk, cheese, tofu, soy-milk, breakfast cereals, and leafy green vegetables. If the daily calcium intake is insufficient, the body uses calcium found in the bones which weakens them over time. 

Vitamin D assists the body to absorb calcium from the consumed foods and supports bone growth and reformation. The skin can naturally make vitamin D through sun exposure. But the amount needed varies depending on one’s skin tone, use of sunscreen, the season, and age. Foods such as salmon, tuna, and egg yolks can also be a good source of vitamin D. Notably, Health Canada recommends that people over 50 years of age take daily vitamin D supplements, since obtaining sufficient vitamin D exclusively through diet and sunlight can be difficult [7]. 

Burden in Canada  

In a report by the Canadian Institute of Health Research (2016), the national costs attributed to osteoporosis fractures in 2011 cumulated to $4.6 billion. This is an 83% increase since the previous 2008 report [2]. The increase in expenditures are explained by the rise in admissions for acute care, rehabilitation, and complex continuing care [2]. Such findings also underlie the necessity of using more healthcare resources and preventative care for this disease [2]. 

In assessing Canada’s different elements of osteoporosis care, the health care system performs generally quite well – there are short wait times for hip fracture surgery and integration of various risk assessment algorithms [1]. However, further initiatives could be taken, such as a nation-wide fracture database to track incidence rates and monitor the delivery of healthcare. Osteoporosis is also not officially recognized as a health priority in many provinces [1]. 

Most importantly, there is a salient gap in best-known practices of care and the actual services that are provided [7]. Of those with an osteoporosis-related injury, less than 20% received a BMD diagnosis test or any medication within one year of the fracture [7]. 

Factors contributing to this inadequacy are multidimensional. In the context of the patient, there is compromised access to proper testing and treatment, lack of recognition of risk, and lack of healthcare provider awareness.  At a health system level, there is an insufficient alliance between hospitals and community health systems, and poor communication between clinicians over secondary prevention of fracture responsibilities [7]. 

Osteoporosis disease is a heavy burden on public health and women’s health in particular. It is important to raise awareness around the risk factors and encourage women to make long-term lifestyle changes to prevent osteoporosis. Exercising and reducing harmful behaviours such as smoking and drinking alcohol are essential steps in maintaining strong bones. Osteoporosis prevention and treatment need to be a strategic priority within the public health system throughout the country. 

References

1. Amgen Canada. (2020, October 20). New Scorecard Reveals Critical Need to Make Osteoporosis a National Health Priority. Cision. https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/new-scorecard-reveals-critical-need-to-make-osteoporosis-a-national-health-priority-806500026.html

2. Hopkins, R. B., Burke, N., Von Keyserlingk, C., Leslie, W. D., Morin, S. N., Adachi, J. D., … & Tarride, J. (2016). The current economic burden of illness of osteoporosis in Canada. Osteoporosis International, 27(10), 3023-3032.

3. Keen, M. U., & Reddivari, A. K. R. (2020). Osteoporosis In Females. StatPearls [Internet].

4. National Osteoporosis Foundation. (2020, December 21). What Women Need to Know. https://www.nof.org/preventing-fractures/general-facts/what-women-need-to-know/

5. “Osteoporosis Canada.” Osteoporosis Canada |, 4 Jan. 2021, osteoporosis.ca/. 

6. Osteoporosis | Womenshealth.gov. (2019, May 20). Womenshealth.Gov. https://www.womenshealth.gov/a-z-topics/osteoporosis

7. Public Health Agency of Canada. (2020, November 27). Osteoporosis and related fractures in Canada: Report from the Canadian Chronic Disease Surveillance System 2020 – Canada.ca. Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/diseases-conditions/osteoporosis-related-fractures-2020.html

Photo by Lucas Favre on Unsplash